Telehealth Cybersecurity: Secure Remote Patient Monitoring Ecosystem
summary
Project produces a tested RPM Reference Architecture built with 10 industry collaborators, maps controls to NIST Risk Management, Cybersecurity and Privacy Frameworks, and publishes SP 18-30 draft for public comment. Risk assessment uses a threat-centric approach and a labed model implementation with cloud hosting (MiFi suggested for rural connectivity) and full Volume C deployment steps documenting configurations. Project cites a 26% rise in reported healthcare breaches in 2020 and operational wins like a prior program saving 9,454 miles and ~$300,000, arguing for NIST Cybersecurity Framework adoption.
AI-written summary · about
chapters (16)
- 0:00Introduction
- 2:25Axel Worth
- 3:25Sue Wang
- 3:47Project Motivation
- 5:49Challenges
- 10:35Remote Patient Monitoring
- 11:24Technology Perspective
- 12:18Cybersecurity Challenges
- 13:24Net Standards
- 17:02What could happen if a RPM ecosystem is a compromise
- 17:46How this project evaluated the risk to the RPM ecosystem
- 21:00Implementing good security is hard
- 22:20What is the practical solution
- 28:38Industry role
- 33:55Wrapup
- 35:35Closing Comments
related talks
51mSecuring Medical Devices—When Cyber Really Is a Life and Death Issue
45mTraceability In Cyber Security:Lessons Learned From The Medical Sector
42mStrategic Implementation of the NIST Risk Management Framework (RMF)
29mManaging Privacy and Cyber In A Pandemic: Lessons Learned For 2021 & Beyond
47mCybersecurity: Is It about Business or Technology?
36mNot Your Mama's Risk Assessment
28mHealthcare and IoT cybersecurity in the new age
30mCybersecurity in the White Coat Pocket: Mobile Security for Hospital, Care and Provision