Some Implications for the use of Gen AI in courts
summary
Generative LLMs like ChatGPT/GPT-3.5 are already appearing in real court work: judges in Brazil and Colombia use them to draft rulings, one case contains false case citations that the model invented, and another judge admitted outsourcing sentences when overloaded. Automated systems also decide Brazilian Social Security claims in minutes and often deny benefits. Main claims: LLMs produce variable, statistical answers that cannot reliably apply legal principles, so there is a push for a constitutional right to know whether a human or machine decides a case.
AI-written summary · about
chapters (11)
- 0:00Introduction to the keynote
- 1:21Understanding AI history
- 4:28Machine and deep learning
- 8:10Defining AI in law
- 11:22How generative AI works
- 14:42Legal decision-making
- 20:46Risks of AI in court
- 27:07AI use in Brazil's judiciary
- 33:18Concerns with AI autonomy
- 43:09The need for human oversight
- 52:57Closing remarks
related talks
46mAI for Legal : The story of hype, adoption and what comes next
28mEthical AI?!
32mHow generative AI is Changing the way people interact with computers
29mGenerative-AI: Usecase-Specific Evaluation of LLM-powered Applications
01h 13mDebating ethical GenAI for education: sector-governed solutions and critique
27mAI and Geospatial Analysis. What has changed?
13mNew Challenges in Software Quality Brought by GenAI and LLMs
15mHarnessing the Power of Generative AI for Intelligent Applications