Networks Cocaine and Fruit Flies
summary
Group experiments use plexiglass arenas and a CTech flight‑tracker to record 30 adult male Drosophila (3–5 days old) across 20 bottles, comparing regular food versus food laced with cocaine; trajectories are tracked, identities manually validated, and networks built with directed, weighted edges for count and duration. Key findings: duration of interactions increases and interaction count rises after cocaine, while community structure deteriorates — modularity drops. Pipeline is automated (16–20 videos/day), code lives on GitHub, and temporal analysis is ongoing.
AI-written summary · about
chapters (20)
- 0:00Introduction
- 1:08Speaker and research
- 2:57Fruit flies as model
- 4:22Isolation and drug use
- 6:06Experiment setup
- 7:30Data collection method
- 8:54Social interactions defined
- 11:05Building interaction networks
- 12:51Cocaine’s impact on networks
- 13:53Network changes with cocaine
- 14:56Fragile X genome research
- 15:42Future research and automation
- 16:24Acknowledgments
- 17:09Q&A: Methamphetamine to cocaine
- 18:34Q&A: Timeline and automation
- 18:55Q&A: Genomics or pharmacology
- 19:38Q&A: Temporal drug effects
- 21:02Q&A: Dosage and randomness
- 22:10Q&A: Community detection
- 23:18Q&A wrap-up
related talks
31mSpatial Gene Expression Patterns in Drosophila
13mSocial Physics
45mEvidence of social learning across symbolic cultural barriers in sperm whales
30mCracking the code: neuronal networks in the brain
58mIntroduction to Biological Network Analysis I: Network Basics and Properties
01h 12mSocial Network Analysis in Python
43mCoin-Flipping in the Brain: Probabilistic Computation and Learning in the Assembly Model
42mFlying Python at 40,000 feet
