Panel: AI Intellectual Property
summary
Serbia reports creative industries at 5.5% of GDP with about 100,000 workers and video games downloaded/paid over 100 million times in 2022; the IP office uses WIPO goods and service assistant and an EPO patent OCR project and donated Serbian–English patent corpora for machine translation. Panelists describe reality: web scraping and bulk-data deals lack clear rules, data auditing tools are weak, prompt authorship rarely secures strong copyright, recommended practice is to document sketches, feed private datasets and always verify AI outputs.
AI-written summary · about
chapters (8)
- 0:00AI and IP opening
- 11:49Panel introduction
- 13:24Training data legal issues
- 21:39Copyright for AI output
- 34:52AI training legal/tech
- 42:39AI provider terms
- 45:11AI regulation gaps
- 51:59Closing remarks
related talks
23mHow is international collaboration on AI shaping sustainable development?
15mWho is the owner of AI-Generated works?
48mPanel: Why Open Source AI Matters for Europe
31mPanel: Navigating the AI Policy Landscape
32mIntellectual Property Considerations for Developing and Licensing Software
58mUsing AI in games
52mHow is international collaboration on AI shaping sustainable development?
51mUnlocking Europe's AI Potential