Examining the Examiners: Students' Privacy and Security Perceptions of Online
summary
Paper analyzes extension reviews and privacy policies then surveys n=102 students about concrete proctoring tools, finding 64% report monitoring as stressful, 60% say cheating remains possible, and 97% were required to use proctoring. Students deem lockdown browser and webcam recording more necessary but report discomfort with webcams, microphones, web‑history monitoring and eye movement tracking. Main concerns are amount and sensitivity of data collected, installation of third‑party software, and institutional power that compels compliance despite privacy trade‑offs.
AI-written summary · about
chapters (11)
- 0:00Intro
- 0:58Research Questions
- 1:10Study Design
- 1:39Prevalence of Monitoring Types
- 1:50Student Experience of Monitoring
- 2:10Necessity of Monitoring Types
- 2:29Comfort with Monitoring Types
- 2:57Effectiveness of Online Proctoring
- 3:07Thoughts About Effectiveness
- 4:29Power Imbalances
- 4:45Necessary Types of Monitoring
related talks
01h 13mSTUDENT PRIVACY AT RISK UNDER COVID-19: ONLINE TEST PROCTORING BRINGS AI AND SURVEILLANCE INTO...
05mMedia Portrayals of Student Privacy in Higher Education: A 2013-2023 Review
01h 04mAcademic sessions privacy and surveillance
08mPrivacy Is the Price: Player Views and Technical Evaluation of Data Practices in Online Games
01h 12mBentham goes to school: surveillance and student privacy in the classroom.
14mTowards Understanding Privacy and Trust in Online Reporting of Sexual Assault
31mPanel on Privacy
01h 13mFeminist perspectives on privacy and data protection.
