Deciding on Personalized Ads: Nudging Developers About User Privacy
summary
An online between-subjects survey experiment with 400 developers tests six dashboard framings (Control, CCPA-like, GDPR-like, user-facing description, privacy-focused condition, revenue-focused and privacy-vs-revenue) by walking participants through a mock Acme ad-network setup that exports code. Presentation of privacy consequences increases selection of non-personalized ads: the privacy-focused framing makes non-personalized choices about 11.06 times more likely than Control. Results show concrete interface wording and API/sample-code cues change developer choices about ad personalization and revenue trade-offs.
AI-written summary · about
chapters (6)
related talks
11mCreating Effective Labels
34mThe ethics of data: Privacy vs. personalization
32mTime for a Change – Data Privacy as Competitive Differentiator in Marketing
42mPrivacy as a Brand Differentiator
01h 15mTHE ROLE OF TRANSPARENCY, USER CONTROL, AND THE BALANCE BETWEEN FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS
42mCurated Panel: The Privacy-First Advantage: Smarter Data, Smarter Monetization In 2026.
33mDesigning and Building With Privacy In Mind
15mTurning Privacy Risk Assessment Into 20 Questions for Developers
