STUDENT PRIVACY AT RISK UNDER COVID-19: ONLINE TEST PROCTORING BRINGS AI AND SURVEILLANCE INTO...
summary
Online proctoring systems require camera, microphone, desktop and keystroke access, upload video and biometric data to third‑party vendors, and run proprietary AI that generates flags or risk scores; vendors named in hearings include Proctorio and ProctorU and testing platforms such as Pearson VUE. Evidence shows biased failure modes — poor recognition of darker faces, disproportionate flags for disabled students — a major data breach exposed roughly 400,000 records, courts and DPAs face complaints and some institutions withdraw or pause use.
AI-written summary · about
chapters (5)
- 0:00Start
- 5:18Director of the Open Knowledge Justice Program in the United Kingdom
- 23:28Security under Gdpr
- 46:02Student Surveillance Ecosystem
- 55:19What Are some of the Specific Strategies That Educators Can Use To Avoid Relying on Automated Proctoring and
related talks
05mExamining the Examiners: Students' Privacy and Security Perceptions of Online
05mMedia Portrayals of Student Privacy in Higher Education: A 2013-2023 Review
05mVirtual Classrooms and Real Harms: Remote Learning at U.S. Universities
01h 21mEmpirical methods fairer AI - Auditing a Dutch public sector risk profiling algorithm
32mEthical Challenges and responsible use of AI in Higher Education.
01h 10mAcademic sessions health, risk and data protection
01h 12mBentham goes to school: surveillance and student privacy in the classroom.
01h 14mCPDP ACADEMIC SESSION II