PROTECTING CONSUMERS IN THE DATA SOCIETY: IT’S THE ENFORCEMENT, STUPID!
summary
Panel argues enforcement matters as much as rules and gives concrete examples: CNIL levies €140 million fines in 2020 including €100m on Google and €35m on Amazon and issues binding orders with daily penalties; Bundeskartellamt wins an Amazon settlement in 2019 but pursues a Facebook decision begun in 2016 and decided 2019; new German §19a speeds single‑instance rulings and shifts burden of proof; reviewers flag the Fitbit merger remedies, the DMA/DSA gatekeeper designation and article 5(a) prohibition on cross‑service data combining as key enforcement tests.
AI-written summary · about
chapters (6)
- 0:00Start
- 0:22The Digital Clearing House
- 3:09Bill Kovacic
- 21:59How To Improve Enforcement of the Digital Law in Europe
- 36:04The Shift of the Burden of Proof
- 46:52The Right to Data Portability
related talks
01h 20mEnforcing EU's Digital Regulations in Court - How Can Civil Society Step in?
01h 16mEnforcing the EU’s Digital Laws Delivering European Tech Policies that serve People...
21mA question of values – The cooperation of European data protection
01h 11mEffective Enforcement, Is that not the answer?
01h 23mPrivacy and competition in the digital economy.
28mGDRP - Sanctions and Industry Standards
01h 15mEnforcement of GDPR – A reality check.
01h 07mThe GDPR and the broader EU Digital Rulebook
