Enforcing EU's Digital Regulations in Court - How Can Civil Society Step in?
summary
Panel argues private litigation must back public enforcement by using the Representative Actions Directive, DSA/DMA/GDPR provisions and national courts to force remedies and damages, citing concrete moves like German preliminary injunctions against Meta, NOIB becoming a qualified entity and consumer groups seeking follow‑on redress. Major hurdles are 1.3% fine rate for DPAs, the Ireland/one‑stop‑shop bottleneck and evidence barriers — especially article 40 data access delays — plus opt‑in rules, funding shortages and unclear cross‑border jurisdiction.
AI-written summary · about
chapters (12)
- 0:00EU digital regulation enforcement
- 3:37Civil society and private enforcement
- 8:35Public vs private enforcement
- 14:53Academic view on litigation
- 20:09Enforcing DSA in courts
- 26:35Courts vs regulators for enforcement
- 33:12Representative action directive role
- 39:11GDPR private enforcement hurdles
- 54:08Access to justice barriers
- 1:00:27Improving enforcement systems
- 1:13:34Regulators and courts interplay
- 1:20:00Q&A
related talks
01h 14mSEE YOU IN COURT!
01h 32mEDPS-Civil Society Summit 2018.
01h 13mPROTECTING CONSUMERS IN THE DATA SOCIETY: IT’S THE ENFORCEMENT, STUPID!
01h 15mOVERSIGHT AND ENFORCEMENT: TAKING STOCK OF DESIGN CHOICES AND TRADE-OFFS
01h 16mThe role and power of DPAS - Between CJEU and GDPR.
01h 16mEnforcing Digital Regulation in Times of Omnibus
01h 11mEffective Enforcement, Is that not the answer?
01h 07mThe GDPR and the broader EU Digital Rulebook