Enforcing Digital Regulation in Times of Omnibus
summary
Panel maps concrete frictions: a commission report flags 54 interacting instruments, the DSA team reports 17 open DSA investigations and one closed, and national DPAs levy fines (Spanish DPA v Yoti on biometric age checks). Practical fixes include mutual assistance obligations, ad hoc coordination bodies and pre‑existing working groups (27 authorities, ~100 officials; UNESCO network ~34 regulators). Main failures are overlapping mandates, uneven independence and technical capacity gaps; proposed omnibus tweaks risk narrowing GDPR scope and creating new legal uncertainty.
AI-written summary · about
chapters (8)
- 0:00Digital regulation enforcement intro
- 1:58Constitutional principles
- 14:45EC's DSA enforcement
- 24:55Member states' AI/GDPR role
- 37:17Global enforcement challenges
- 51:04Q&A on enforcement models
- 1:06:12Capacity building & engagement
- 1:15:24Closing remarks
related talks
01h 12mEmerging Patterns in EU Digital Regulation
01h 15mOVERSIGHT AND ENFORCEMENT: TAKING STOCK OF DESIGN CHOICES AND TRADE-OFFS
01h 20mEnforcing EU's Digital Regulations in Court - How Can Civil Society Step in?
01h 14mLessons from the GDPR Red Lines or Red Tape
01h 07mThe GDPR and the broader EU Digital Rulebook
01h 16mThe role and power of DPAS - Between CJEU and GDPR.
43mPanel: Cooperation For a Functioning Data Protection Framework
01h 11mEffective Enforcement, Is that not the answer?