OVERSIGHT AND ENFORCEMENT: TAKING STOCK OF DESIGN CHOICES AND TRADE-OFFS
summary
Panel argues GDPR enforcement is patchy: cross‑border one-stop shop transfers stall (a landmark complaint sits unresolved after 980 days), and many DPAs lack people, powers and fines big enough to change behaviour. Regulators borrow telco tactics — asymmetric regulation targeting dominant platforms, proactive market monitoring, forced infrastructure access down to technical details (door codes, APIs) — and stress government backing, multi‑stakeholder input, AML‑style sanctions and quicker interim remedies rather than slow court testing.
AI-written summary · about
chapters (10)
- 0:00Start
- 2:06Opening Thoughts
- 5:47Regulation of the Tech Sector
- 22:46Is There Still Tension between Eu Member States
- 32:49Asymmetric Regulation
- 46:58Agency-Led Enforcement What Sort of Lessons Can We Learn As Well as Enforcement
- 54:46What Sort of of Government Buy-In Political Backing Do You Need as a Regulator
- 1:03:39How Do You Think We Should Regulate Social Platforms To Prevent Market Manipulation as We'Ve Seen Happening with Gamestop
- 1:04:45Digital Services Act
- 1:09:32What Can We Learn from Other Sectors
related talks
01h 14mLessons from the GDPR Red Lines or Red Tape
01h 11mEffective Enforcement, Is that not the answer?
01h 16mEnforcing Digital Regulation in Times of Omnibus
01h 12mEmerging Patterns in EU Digital Regulation
01h 07mThe GDPR and the broader EU Digital Rulebook
01h 20mEnforcing EU's Digital Regulations in Court - How Can Civil Society Step in?
21mA question of values – The cooperation of European data protection
01h 09mREGULATION OF GLOBAL DATA FLOWS: A STORY OF THE IMPOSSIBLE?