SEE YOU IN COURT!
summary
EU representative‑action rules set by the new Directive enable collective claims for GDPR, DMA and DSA breaches but member states lag on implementation and vary widely in scope and procedure. Designated entities must register on domestic or EU lists, cross‑border suits face stricter thresholds, and funding is decisive: litigation uses opt-out for domestic classes or costly opt‑in abroad, relies on third‑party funders take ~20–25% or public funds and settlement routes like the Dutch model. Judicial case law already shifts liability: Post CJEU rejects de minimis threshold for non‑material damages, making mass redress financially plausible.
AI-written summary · about
chapters (12)
- 0:00Introduction
- 4:13Collective Redress Directive
- 7:44Directive for civil society
- 11:21Representative actions in consumer protection
- 16:36Settlement mechanisms in EU
- 20:32Qualified entities criteria
- 25:54Cross-border litigation systems
- 32:26Implementation challenges in EU
- 35:55Funding challenges for litigation
- 50:48Damages in digital rights
- 58:25Q&A
- 1:08:00Closing remarks
related talks
01h 20mEnforcing EU's Digital Regulations in Court - How Can Civil Society Step in?
01h 32mEDPS-Civil Society Summit 2018.
26mData Protection Update and Tales from the Introduction of the GDPR
53mGDPR and International Data Transfers
01h 16mThe role and power of DPAS - Between CJEU and GDPR.
01h 12mEmerging Patterns in EU Digital Regulation
01h 21mBalancing Data Protection and Workplace Justice GDPR’s Role in Employee Rights ..
01h 07mThe GDPR and the broader EU Digital Rulebook