BEYOND ETHICS WASHING:IMPACT ASSESSMENTS, AUDITS, AND OVERSIGHT FOR AI
summary
Panelists report concrete tools and pilots: a Freya fundamental‑rights impact assessment used two years in Dutch government, employer experiments with an algorithmic registry and published model/data cards, and corporate tests of impact‑assessment tooling and bias‑mitigation research. They log training of ~200 civil servants, flag dozens of real‑world failures (child‑benefit type harms, municipal scorecards), and propose a common law‑enforcement information‑sharing mechanism across ~23 oversight bodies. Practice shows assessments must run at ideation and continuously, and legal bases are required before automating decision‑making.
AI-written summary · about
chapters (10)
- 0:00Introduction
- 1:50AI regulation paradox
- 4:17Industry compliance challenges
- 11:42Impact assessments in practice
- 19:35Civil society demands
- 27:17Policy making for AI oversight
- 39:20Ethics versus law
- 49:01Enforcement mechanisms
- 1:00:09Q&A
- 1:15:28Future of AI regulation
related talks
01h 18mWhich Impact Assessment for AI, Beyond Data Protection
01h 10mWorking on Current and Future Governance and Control of AI and Algorithms
01h 17mASSESSING THE IMPACT ON FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS IN AI APPLICATIONS
01h 09mGOVERNANCE AND REGULATION OF AI FROM THE PERSPECTIVE OF AUTONOMY AND PRIVACY
01h 20mThe use of AI by public authorities.
21mUnderstanding Human Impact: Social and Equity Assessments for AI Technologies
36mKeynote: Ethics in AI: Building Fair and Just Intelligence Systems
31mPanel: Navigating the AI Policy Landscape