Working on Current and Future Governance and Control of AI and Algorithms
summary
Department for algorithmic oversight within the Dutch DPA is rolling out biannual risk reports and pushing organizations to prepare for the AI Act by using concrete methods: an AI incidents monitor that collects publicly reported cases, an OECD-backed 600 tools catalog for bias and safety, and statistical checks (they showcase a 300,000-student dataset and recommend Z-tests and clustering plus synthetic data). Expect practical guidance on joint‑controller risk, FRIA-like assessments, and citizen co‑creation models.
AI-written summary · about
chapters (10)
- 0:00AI governance panel intro
- 1:44Current governance challenges
- 9:35Key regulators and oversight
- 13:28Statistical tools for AI
- 21:26AI governance instruments
- 28:52AI implementation challenges
- 35:23Citizen engagement in regulation
- 43:34OECD AI governance toolbox
- 53:00Quantitative vs normative assessments
- 1:02:37Q&A on AI risks
related talks
01h 16mBEYOND ETHICS WASHING:IMPACT ASSESSMENTS, AUDITS, AND OVERSIGHT FOR AI
36mResponsible AI: In Theory, Practice, and Policies
01h 08mAI Act in Action Compliance, Oversight, and Enforcement
01h 09mGOVERNANCE AND REGULATION OF AI FROM THE PERSPECTIVE OF AUTONOMY AND PRIVACY
53mAI: Law, Policy and Common Sense Suggestions on How to Stay Out of Trouble
25mPanel: Ethics and Regulations in AI Governance
01h 08mTHE GOVERNANCE OF AI: CONVERGENCE OR DIVERGENCE?
01h 10mNavigating the Interface Between the AI Act and GDPR Combining Innovation and ..