GOVERNANCE AND REGULATION OF AI FROM THE PERSPECTIVE OF AUTONOMY AND PRIVACY
summary
The panel argues the EU AI Act adds regulatory layers over GDPR but cannot alone handle group privacy or “abnormal justice”; examples include large language models amplifying web bias and climate harms, and facial recognition workflows that rely on a reference database → biometric comparison → human reviewer chain. NIST tests of ~300 algorithms show top models with no measurable demographic impact, predictive‑policing pilots produce two toolkits (PATROL, PROHIK) yet suffer low officer uptake, and regulated sandboxes with supervisory review are essential for real‑world tests.
AI-written summary · about
chapters (11)
- 0:00Start
- 5:17Beyond Principles
- 7:12Abnormal Justice
- 15:24The Right to Privacy and Reproductive Autonomy
- 17:57Ai Discrimination
- 26:09Live Image Acquisition
- 27:42Reference Database
- 28:43Biometric Comparison System
- 36:50Predictive Policing
- 59:35The Bias and Predictive Policing
- 1:06:54How Do We Measure Impact
related talks
01h 08mTHE GOVERNANCE OF AI: CONVERGENCE OR DIVERGENCE?
25mPanel: Ethics and Regulations in AI Governance
01h 11mThe Intersection of AI and Regulation How Organisations and Regulators Should...
46mTowards Trustworthy AI: The European Approach
01h 17mGoverning AI in Europe Advancing Fundamental Rights...
53mAI: Law, Policy and Common Sense Suggestions on How to Stay Out of Trouble
01h 10mNavigating the Interface Between the AI Act and GDPR Combining Innovation and ..
53m10 Key Challenges for AI within the EU Data Protection Framework