CALIBRATING THE AI ACT - IS IT THE RIGHT FRAMING TO PROTECT PERSONAL AND FUNDAMENTAL RIGHT
summary
European AI law treats AI largely as product safety: it puts exhaustive risk-management duties on providers, excludes individual consumers from rights, and makes professional users follow provider instructions for use, which risks locking out SMEs and reclassifying customizers as liable providers. The draft omits liability rules, relies on standardization that could privatize legal values, lacks measurable metrics for fairness/accuracy, and needs independent testing, deployer impact assessments and explicit redress and explanation rights.
AI-written summary · about
chapters (5)
- 0:00Start
- 3:23Conclusion
- 10:59Principle of Autonomy
- 36:45Autonomy of Artificial Intelligence
- 52:44Allocation of Responsibilities
related talks
01h 17mGoverning AI in Europe Advancing Fundamental Rights...
01h 08mTHE GOVERNANCE OF AI: CONVERGENCE OR DIVERGENCE?
01h 15mAssessing Fundamental Rights Risks of AI Opportunities and Challenges Ahead
53mAI: Law, Policy and Common Sense Suggestions on How to Stay Out of Trouble
15mThe AI Act: Striking a Deal & Beyond
17mAI Law & Ethics: developing responsible AI systems
28mAI Act - What is important to know from a developers perspective?
01h 14mLatest Developments in AI and Data Protection Legal Uncertainty Despite