EDPL Young Scholar Award
summary
Two winning entries critique EU rules with concrete claims and fixes. One argues the AI Act wrongly treats biometric verification as low risk, shows vendors (Clearview, ID.me) and cases (Uber/Mannang, Microsoft software failures) reveal one-to-many searches, enrollment without active consent, probabilistic biases and deepfake threats, and warns against centralized cloud databases; recommends GDPR compliance, local template storage and regulation keyed to storage/location. The other maps enforcement gaps: DPAs (Irish DPC bottleneck) struggle under One-Stop-Shop, urges DPA transparency, EDPB taskforce, and notice-and-delist plus judicial review where content is not manifestly inaccurate.
AI-written summary · about
chapters (9)
- 0:00Welcome
- 1:24Selection process
- 2:51Biometric verification risks
- 21:25Discussion on biometric paper
- 27:47Questions and answers on biometric verification
- 37:26Right to be forgotten enforcement
- 55:57Discussion on RTBF paper
- 1:02:48Final questions and closing remarks
- 1:07:01Award announcement
related talks
01h 10mEDPL Young Scholar Award
01h 12mEmerging Patterns in EU Digital Regulation
01h 08mTHE GOVERNANCE OF AI: CONVERGENCE OR DIVERGENCE?
29mKeynote Address: Anu Talus, Chair, EDPB | 14th Annual European Data Protection & Privacy Conference
01h 14mSenior Academic Session I.
37mHow to Improve the Regulatory Framework to Foster Innovation
32mHow the EU Digital Omnibus Could Re-Write Privacy & AI Law
01h 14mNavigating regulatory complexities Enforcing data protection in the field of AI