A Call for Data Dignity Is there a Need for a New Right to Be Seen in the Age of...
summary
Panelists present concrete audits and experiments: a review of 26 affective-computing datasets finds heavy skews to White subjects aged 20–30 and no mention of health conditions; a 2,400-person UK survey rates 576 occupations and GPT‑4 is probed 50 times per job (via the API) — scores correlate with humans but systematically overvalue LLM‑adjacent roles and underestimate manual or local jobs; a 96-person focus group shows 64% refuse to sell health data. The session pushes data dignity and right to be seen toward actionable demands like transparency obligations and competence over accuracy.
AI-written summary · about
chapters (6)
- 0:00Introduction
- 1:25Defining data dignity
- 12:40Right to be seen in AI
- 27:03Representation gaps in data
- 46:18Panel discussion
- 1:07:23Audience questions and closing remarks
related talks
05mPrivacy, identity, and autonomy in the age of big data and AI
32mData Ethics Panel
01h 14mEthical data handling
01h 27mTrans-atlantic discussions: Developing a sustainable 'Big Data' ecosystem ...
01h 04mData Hemorrhage, Inequality, and You...
34mThe ethics of data: Privacy vs. personalization
01h 15mTHE ROLE OF TRANSPARENCY, USER CONTROL, AND THE BALANCE BETWEEN FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS
11mAddressing Privacy, Bias, and Fairness in AI Systems