The use of AI by the Judiciary in LatAm Countries Hallucination or Opportunity?
summary
Brazil already issues resolution 332 (2020) and updates it with resolution 615 (Mar 2025), deploys a Synapsis platform and the Vitória filter, and reports 140+ court AI solutions nationwide; ChatGPT use produces a 2023 miscarriage of justice (eight non‑existent precedents) and a study finds ChatGPT misses 5 of 14 LGPD criteria while only CL Meta AI Gemini meet >10 criteria and Deepseek/Grok fail half. Colombia uses a decision‑tree tool Ptoria for case routing; Chile pilots in‑house Husta for audio transcription. Main problems are data protection, opaque contracts, training gaps and Article 19 allowing judges to hire external tools.
AI-written summary · about
chapters (8)
- 0:00Welcome
- 2:11AI in Brazilian judiciary
- 15:00AI in Mexico and Colombia courts
- 28:51AI in Chilean judiciary
- 47:53AI regulation in Argentina
- 58:35Regional challenges and public perception
- 1:11:20Public trust and AI bill in Brazil
- 1:24:11Closing and Q&A
related talks
01h 22mAI Needs a Strategy, not just Regulation! Comparing Initiatives Across Latin America
28mMachine Learning applied to judicial decisions
29mEY Aleph: deep learning applied to jurimetrics practice
27mAI and Geospatial Analysis. What has changed?
01h 20mThe use of AI by public authorities.
29mResponsible AI Challenges and Recommendations
33mAI for Good: Transforming Industries with Ethical & Innovative Solutions
40mJudgement Day: Benchmarking "Black Box" LLMs With Open Legal Datasets