Assessing the societal impact of automated border control gates.
summary
Panel reports concrete field work: interviews with 155 airport passengers, observations and focus groups show 31% adoption of 65 eGates at 15 UK sites and 75% of interviewees never used them; pilots reveal layout, usability and photo-quality errors that cut throughput and exclude children and wheelchair users. Projects run biometric trials (iris, fingerprints), prototype kiosks and policy audits, warn of corridor sensing and function creep and call for built-in legal rules and continuous auditing.
AI-written summary · about
chapters (7)
- 0:00Start
- 0:12Ann-Charlotte Nygård, European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights (EU)
- 6:07Anne-Marie Oostveen, Oxford Internet Institute (UK)
- 17:04Sadhbh McCarthy, Centre for Irish and European Security (IE)
- 17:43Irma van der Ploeg Maastricht University (NL)
- 29:21Mark Maguire, National University of Ireland Maynooth (IE)
- 37:47Peter Graham, IBM (UK)
related talks
01h 16mTechnologies for border control and beyond ...
28mDesigning Digital Experiences for Travel
01h 14mAutomatic Face Recognition in the UK: Policy and Practice.
14mLarge Scale Pilots Update: Progress, Early Conclusions & Use Case Implications (APTITUDE)
01h 05mFacial recognition, a 'convenient' and 'efficient' solution looking for a problem?
19mDigital Transformation at BER
01h 15mSurveillance And Criminal Law.
01h 16mBEYOND ETHICS WASHING:IMPACT ASSESSMENTS, AUDITS, AND OVERSIGHT FOR AI
