Who best watches the watchers?
summary
Compares concrete oversight failures and fixes across four systems: US Congress keeps power of the purse and a Speech or Debate shield that could have exposed bulk collection, but courts and FISC secrecy limit checks; UK reports show 1,500 Investigatory Powers Tribunal complaints (2000–2012) with only 10 upheld, an ISC that the executive can redact and a stalled Communications Data Bill; Germany reveals a 2003 BND–NSA fibre‑tapping project without legal basis; the Netherlands admits 4,500–5,000 intelligence staff, ministerial control and a secret committee whose access is effective but non‑remedial — all call for more resources, technical expertise and parliamentary inquiry committee powers.
AI-written summary · about
chapters (10)
- 0:00Surveillance oversight debate
- 3:37US oversight mechanisms
- 11:44UK oversight challenges
- 21:59German oversight failures
- 32:55Dutch oversight issues
- 43:56Whistleblower protections
- 58:31Political surveillance expansion
- 1:03:29Model oversight reforms
- 1:08:27UK privacy board proposal
- 1:15:15Closing remarks
related talks
01h 13mBoundaries of law: Global perspectives on transparency, accountability & oversight ...
01h 15mUS and Transatlantic Debates: Government And Law Enforcement Use Of Data.
01h 14mRegulatory choices and privacy consequences
01h 23mRound-table, Government hacking in different national contexts and strategies ...
01h 13mEU-US DATA PRIVACY FRAMEWORK:HOW DOES THE US EO SUSTAIN A NEW DURABLE AGREEMENT?
01h 11mExchange with policy-makers - Government hacking for surveillance.
01h 12mWhat the Schrems decision means in the US and Europe.
01h 10mSecrecy as mode of governance