Private use in public and public use in private. ...
summary
Argument: the internet collapses the public/private line in copyright so private copying is an exception not an escape, CJEU demands lawful sources, and DRM/cloud services create a device-based private sphere where vendors, not walls, control use. Proposal: replace place-based tests with an exploitation test that asks who extracts economic value. In data protection the household exception is narrowly read (Linkfist/Rhinus), so personal uploads (eg revenge porn) remain covered while text and data mining expose dubious technical-copy issues.
AI-written summary · about
chapters (5)
- 0:00Welcome
- 1:07Copyright law basics
- 21:35Data protection basics
- 45:06Device privacy exploitation
- 1:04:16Q&A
related talks
48mProtection of Private Life — A Challenging Exercise
04mPrivacy in the age of the cloud. Which law applies? Who will apply it? – Peter Fleischer
01h 02mWeaponizing Technology: Examining the Importance of Privacy...
45mPrivacy is not Binary: A discussion of data systems, ethics, and human rights
07mDon’t mix and match! The right to the protection ...
01h 02mPeople, Industry & Government
33mOn Valuing and Procuring Private Data
44mHybrid Legal-Technical Concepts of Privacy