Privacy by analogy. Lessons from copyright law, environmental law ...
summary
Panel argues EU privacy needs second‑generation regulation: set goals, let industry design means, not prescriptive tech rules. Proposes a centralized data release inventory modeled on the Toxic Release Inventory (45% cut in releases in 10 years) to rank firms and drive market pressure. Recommends stronger cross‑sector enforcement (consumer law wins force Apple to change iCloud terms; FTC brings privacy cases under unfair practices), formal collecting societies or binding corporate rules with mandated consumer representation, and class actions to internalize externalities.
AI-written summary · about
chapters (14)
- 0:00Introduction
- 2:20Privacy by analogy
- 9:38Financial services regulation
- 18:05Privacy regulation
- 19:07Consumer rights
- 20:28Consumer protection laws
- 21:40Consumer protection enforcement
- 23:42Consumer market scoreboards
- 24:47What can be learned
- 28:17Environmental law
- 30:29Information markets
- 40:20Questions
- 50:48Information disclosure
- 54:05Discussion
related talks
17mKeynote
01h 02mPeople, Industry & Government
01h 12mThe Role of Technology in Fostering the Power of Personal Data: Privacy, Trust & Innovation
01h 14mRegulatory choices and privacy consequences
01h 10mResponding to Digital Responsibility Turning Entropy into Governance
47mDesigning for User-Centered Privacy
39mSilent Spring: What if the GDPR Was Real?
30mPanel: Do We Need a Global Approach to Data Protection?