Responding to Digital Responsibility Turning Entropy into Governance
summary
Panel argues that regulatory entropy is real and escalating: 10% to 82% of the global population now covered by data protection in five years, Europe hosts 100 tech laws and 270 regulators, and the EU AI Act cross‑references 30 other laws. Practical responses are concrete: map obligations at scale, build cross‑functional teams, adopt a values‑first “global consistency, local adaptation” model (example: L’Oreal), run pragmatic risk assessments, upskill everyone, prefer interoperable standards and global principles (OECD) over ad‑hoc layers.
AI-written summary · about
chapters (12)
- 0:00Digital governance challenges
- 3:11Digital entropy and policy complexity
- 12:28EU regulation and innovation balance
- 17:07Global polarization in regulation
- 23:10Civil society and human-centered AI
- 28:13Academic risks of regulatory complexity
- 36:04Organizational governance in policy
- 44:19Regulatory policy changes speed round
- 53:34Mature regulatory environments examples
- 58:13L'Oreal's AI governance
- 1:05:22Takeaways for governance teams
- 1:08:31Turning entropy into governance
related talks
01h 12mThe Role of Technology in Fostering the Power of Personal Data: Privacy, Trust & Innovation
01h 11mTransforming GDPR into a Risk Based Harm Tool Alongside Specific AI Regulation...
01h 12mEmerging Patterns in EU Digital Regulation
17mKeynote
39mFrom Policy Enthusiast to Legislators' Contact Point
37mHow to Improve the Regulatory Framework to Foster Innovation
09mInterview with Julie Brill
01h 12mPrivacy by analogy. Lessons from copyright law, environmental law ...