Regulatory choices and privacy consequences
summary
Empirical interviews and document review across France, Germany, Spain, the UK and the US show when ambiguity pairs with real accountability firms build board-level privacy programs and distributed PIAs, but specificity plus fines can produce checklist compliance; critique of the FTC exposes the Bureau of Economics’ reliance on industry-funded papers and weak assessment not audit oversight of consent decrees; debate tests GDPR’s 2/4% fines, Section 702/215 surveillance adequacy, and whether popular claims are zombie ideas worth keeping.
AI-written summary · about
chapters (7)
- 0:00Start
- 0:15Christopher Kuner VUB-Brussels Privacy Hub (BE)
- 1:07David Hoffman Intel (US)
- 3:02Kenneth Bamberger University of California (US)
- 13:08Chris Hoofnagle School of Information, UC Berkeley (US)
- 24:53Peter Hustinx Former European Data Protection Supervisor (EU)
- 35:27Susanne Augenhofer Humboldt-University Berlin (DE)
related talks
01h 15mOVERSIGHT AND ENFORCEMENT: TAKING STOCK OF DESIGN CHOICES AND TRADE-OFFS
43mE-Privacy & GDPR
01h 14mNavigating regulatory complexities Enforcing data protection in the field of AI
01h 14mLessons from the GDPR Red Lines or Red Tape
01h 21mAccountable organizations deserve benefits from regulators.
22mPanel Discussion – 17 months of GDPR experience – Should we review?
01h 12mThe Role of Technology in Fostering the Power of Personal Data: Privacy, Trust & Innovation
01h 12mPrivacy by analogy. Lessons from copyright law, environmental law ...