Proactive processing of data for criminal investigations
summary
After the Paris attacks panels describe a concrete fix: FIUs open encrypted indexes to trusted peers and run a matching procedure that flags cross-border leads (one success traced prepaid credit‑card attempts across Italy, Greece and Belgium). Regulatory gaps matter: the new EU text’s article 9a and unresolved third‑country transfer rules leave firms unsure whether to hand over data, so debates shift to enforceable duties, mandates for remote forensic software, and whether backdoors create unacceptable systemic vulnerabilities.
AI-written summary · about
chapters (9)
- 0:00Proactive data processing intro
- 4:26Financial intelligence cross-border
- 13:04Intelligence sharing challenges
- 21:09EU rules and private cooperation
- 29:15Regulating data transfers and encryption
- 36:04Q&A on cooperation and encryption
- 54:24Legal frameworks for cross-border transfers
- 1:02:38Balancing obligations and voluntary cooperation
- 1:10:06Summary
related talks
01h 20mBeyond the Encryption Debate
01h 11mExchange with policy-makers - Government hacking for surveillance.
01h 09mBalancing Privacy, Security and Public Safety
01h 16mThe EU Law Enforcement Directive: Where It Stands Today
01h 15mUS and Transatlantic Debates: Government And Law Enforcement Use Of Data.
01h 45mBuilding The Digital Fortress: A Toolkit For Cyber Security.
01h 07mAcademic sessions 2.
01h 09mAligning Cybersecurity Information Sharing with the European Data Protection Framework