Trans-Atlantic data flows: in search of a long-term solution
summary
Panel argues a durable post‑Safe Harbor framework must include clear oversight, judicial redress and routine review, not vague promises. Negotiators target a deadline of February 2, 2016 and regulators note roughly 4,000 companies rely on the old scheme so a transition period is urgent. Companies already deploy model contract clauses and binding corporate rules but DPAs may block some. Cited fixes include USA Freedom Act reforms, FISA court privacy advocates and firmer EU rules on signals intelligence.
AI-written summary · about
chapters (6)
- 0:00Start
- 6:21Vesela Gladicheva MLex (BE)
- 8:59Justin Antonipillai U.S: Department of Commerce (US)
- 19:52Chris Hopfensperger BSA | The Software Alliance (US)
- 26:31Marietje Schaake MEP (EU)
- 36:09Geoffrey Robertson QC (UK)
related talks
01h 09mREGULATION OF GLOBAL DATA FLOWS: A STORY OF THE IMPOSSIBLE?
17mEnhancing Transatlantic Data Flows – The Future of Privacy Shield
01h 28mSession 2
01h 20mThe Transatlantic Debate
45mData Privacy Legislation and the Impact on SRE
22mTransatlantic Data Flows
58mGlobal Data Flows and Perspective – Keynote & Panel
01h 15mUS and Transatlantic Debates: Government And Law Enforcement Use Of Data.
