Intelligence services' surveillance in the EU: Fundamental rights, ...
summary
FRA produces a snapshot of EU28 laws and finds only five member states with detailed SIGINT laws (France, Germany, Netherlands, Sweden, UK); fieldwork targets seven countries next. Belgian review opens four inquiries, finds domestic agencies largely uninvolved but unprepared; Italy’s DPA signs a memorandum (11 Nov 2013) to audit service archives. Germany reveals a G10 system of four reviewers, a 20% rule misapplied and effectively 90% outside legal remit, with no consistent judicial authorization.
AI-written summary · about
chapters (7)
- 0:00Introduction and panel setup
- 5:50Contextualizing surveillance
- 9:48Presentation of the FRA report
- 20:06The Belgian experience
- 30:43Italian perspective on DPA
- 36:20Oversight challenges in Germany
- 45:40Q&A and closing remarks
related talks
01h 15mTHE RIGHT OF ACCESS TO POLICE DATABASES
01h 16mThe EU Law Enforcement Directive: Where It Stands Today
01h 10mSurveillance, Democracy and the State
01h 15mUS and Transatlantic Debates: Government And Law Enforcement Use Of Data.
01h 16mData protection for European law enforcement taking stock...
01h 12mACADEMIC SESSION 1
01h 17mThe Law Enforcement Directive A Closer Look at the Current State...
01h 13mLaw Enforcement Directive – Unpacking GDPR’s Little Brother