Balancing Privacy, Security and Public Safety
summary
Commission plans an impact assessment on forcing communication providers to retain data, weighing non‑legislative options and possible legislation; an expert group urges more funding for digital forensics and notes national regimes are inconsistent, with some states keeping 12 months of identifiers; law enforcement urges easier automatic preservation for rapid investigations and cites a German case where a seven‑day commercial retention helped foil an attack; industry resists breaking end-to-end encryption.
AI-written summary · about
chapters (6)
- 0:00Introduction
- 13:32Law enforcement challenges
- 23:13Civil society on privacy rights
- 33:52EU data retention framework
- 45:12Tech companies' role
- 1:00:22Q&A on children's rights
related talks
01h 32mThe right to encryption: Securing private communications versus law enforcement.
01h 11mProactive processing of data for criminal investigations
01h 11mExchange with policy-makers - Government hacking for surveillance.
01h 15mUS and Transatlantic Debates: Government And Law Enforcement Use Of Data.
01h 09mREGULATION OF GLOBAL DATA FLOWS: A STORY OF THE IMPOSSIBLE?
01h 12mACADEMIC SESSION 1
01h 15mSurveillance And Criminal Law.
01h 20mBeyond the Encryption Debate