Bridging Borders: Towards the Interoperability & Convergence of Data Privacy Rules Globally
summary
European Commission reports concrete steps: mutual adequacy deals completed with Japan and negotiated with Brazil, Korea and Kenya; a draft adequacy for the European Patent Organisation; and bridges between contractual clause regimes for ASEAN and beyond. Evidence cited: 6–14% boost in digital trade from adequacy decisions and an adequacy network of 15 jurisdictions. Practical tools discussed include CBPR certification, model contractual clauses, transfer impact assessments and backups to the US framework, with concerns that SMEs can’t afford binding corporate rules.
AI-written summary · about
chapters (10)
- 0:00Global data privacy interoperability
- 1:03EU Commission’s vision for data flows
- 12:44Interoperability and trust progress
- 18:23Challenges in global data transfers
- 21:59Building trust in data mechanisms
- 28:37Operationalizing CBPR
- 31:45Simplifying rules for SMEs
- 38:51AI impact on privacy rules
- 46:14Preventing fragmentation
- 46:36Q&A
related talks
01h 16mData transfers between the EU and ASIA
01h 09mCross border data flow. Where do we stand?
01h 09mREGULATION OF GLOBAL DATA FLOWS: A STORY OF THE IMPOSSIBLE?
01h 17mData Protection, Data Sovereignty and Digital Exchange Unravelling the Dynamics...
01h 15mExploration of the adequacy of privacy protection law ...
01h 14mSession 3
58mGlobal Data Flows and Perspective – Keynote & Panel
01h 11mBetween two commissions: the European Commission meets the Federal Trade Commission