Cross border data flow. Where do we stand?
summary
Panelists argue current tools—adequacy findings, binding corporate rules and APEC’s CBPR—are partial and often incompatible, leaving individuals with few practical remedies; the EU is rewriting transfer rules in the GDPR and is negotiating an umbrella treaty for law‑enforcement data exchanges but it is stalled awaiting US legislative change. Businesses warn data localization or heavy restrictions risks hurting competitiveness (online commerce is cited as $1.5 trillion and estimates show 0.4–1.1% GDP loss); regulators report about a 200% rise in complaints.
AI-written summary · about
chapters (6)
- 0:00Start
- 0:17Christopher Kuner Vrije Universiteit Brussel (BE)
- 4:33Colin Bennett Victoria University (CA)
- 17:04Danilo Doneda Rio de Janeiro State University (BR)
- 29:42Thomas Zerdick European Commission (EU)
- 41:03Hosuk Lee Makiyama ECIPE (BE)
related talks
01h 09mREGULATION OF GLOBAL DATA FLOWS: A STORY OF THE IMPOSSIBLE?
56mBridging Borders: Towards the Interoperability & Convergence of Data Privacy Rules Globally
58mGlobal Data Flows and Perspective – Keynote & Panel
01h 16mData transfers between the EU and ASIA
01h 17mData Protection, Data Sovereignty and Digital Exchange Unravelling the Dynamics...
53mGDPR and International Data Transfers
47mNew Developments in the Field of Data Protection For a More Successful Data Economy
30mPanel: Do We Need a Global Approach to Data Protection?
