Surveillance and intelligence agencies. After Snowden and after Charlie.
summary
After Snowden and Paris the panel maps concrete legal fights and oversight gaps: the UK oversight office runs retrospective, full-system audits and issues 350 recommendations last year while probing requests used to identify journalists’ sources; the CJEU declares the Data Retention Directive invalid and national laws (UK’s DRIPA) and the Microsoft warrant dispute remain pending; Germany’s eight‑member parliamentary inquiry (established 20 March) documents BND data‑handling breaches and the G10 controversy over extraterritorial interception and blocked access to classified files. US law claims broad executive power to override unexecuted international law.
AI-written summary · about
chapters (6)
- 0:00Introduction and panel overview
- 3:50European legal perspectives
- 17:50UK oversight mechanisms
- 29:40German parliamentary inquiry
- 46:12US constitutional framework
- 57:13Audience Q&A and closing
related talks
01h 11mImplementing Trans-Atlantic intelligence reform two years from Snowden.
01h 13mBoundaries of law: Global perspectives on transparency, accountability & oversight ...
01h 15mUS and Transatlantic Debates: Government And Law Enforcement Use Of Data.
01h 12mWhat the Schrems decision means in the US and Europe.
22mTransatlantic Data Flows
01h 15mSurveillance And Criminal Law.
01h 14mRegulatory choices and privacy consequences
01h 12mAdvertisement Intelligence by European Security Agencies