Coorperation between data protection authorities. Threats, challenges and opportunities.
summary
Project FEDRA maps concrete barriers: differing powers, confidentiality laws that block file‑sharing, scarce resources and language gaps; it issues 15 recommendations and wins funding for a second two‑year phase. A planned pan‑European breach exercise uses the Exito simulation to test cross‑border evidence exchange, controller ID and the 24‑hour notification trigger. Case history includes Google Street View and Sony/Adobe/eBay breaches, the Global Privacy Enforcement Network, BCR mutual‑recognition pilots, and citizen litigation showing complaints routinely get dismissed or forced into costly cross‑border court routes.
AI-written summary · about
chapters (7)
- 0:00Start
- 0:13European Commission (EU) European Commission (EU)
- 3:54Gwendal Le Grand CNIL (FR)
- 8:30David Wright Trilateral Research & Consulting (UK)
- 17:52Ignacio Sanchez European Commission (EU)
- 30:08Emmanuelle Bartoli Allen & Overy (FR)
- 44:50Max Schrems Privacy Activist (AT)
related talks
01h 09mAligning Cybersecurity Information Sharing with the European Data Protection Framework
43mPanel: Cooperation For a Functioning Data Protection Framework
21mA question of values – The cooperation of European data protection
01h 15mUS and Transatlantic Debates: Government And Law Enforcement Use Of Data.
01h 12mACADEMIC SESSION 1
05mPrivacy Practices on Trial
01h 16mThe role and power of DPAS - Between CJEU and GDPR.
01h 16mData protection for European law enforcement taking stock...
