Citizens' attitudes to privacy, surveillance and security (2)
summary
Projects claim the simple “privacy for security” trade-off is false and produce concrete tools: large participatory events with 200-person citizen summits and about 2,000 participants overall, plus a DSS delivered as a paper workbook and web thin client that walks officials through scenarios, alternatives, mitigation and voting. Greek survey data shows only one in three saw CCTV as intrusive (2007) and prefers realtime over storage. Trials expose risks — vendor capture, gaming, cross‑border crowdsourcing harms (Internet Eyes charged businesses ~75s/month, users £2/month, top prize £1,000) — and the DSS works as a procedural aid but not a silver bullet.
AI-written summary · about
chapters (15)
- 0:00Start
- 10:14PACT Survey
- 10:54History and Privacy Perception
- 12:32Tolerance towards private CCTV systems
- 15:39Some concluding thoughts
- 18:51Challenges
- 22:42Decision Support Systems?
- 24:08Security and privacy decisions
- 26:55Problems and criticism
- 27:45PRISMS DSS approach
- 30:25Methods
- 42:55User Requirements
- 46:40CRIMESTOPPERS
- 51:28Digital Vigilantism
- 54:44The User Layer
