Don’t mix and match! The right to the protection ...
summary
Argues that the right to protection of personal data is a distinct legal entitlement from the right to privacy, and that conflating them produces faulty remedies and confused litigation strategies. Compares GDPR text, Recitals, Article 4 definitions and selected CJEU/ECHR decisions, shows examples where privacy claims fail but data protection remedies apply, outlines a simple three‑part test for when data‑protection law governs, and reports on regulatory decisions illustrating practical enforcement outcomes.
AI-written summary · about
related talks
17mKeynote
01h 15mSUBJECTS AND STRUCTURES:RE-IMAGINING DATA PROTECTION AS A CRITIQUE OF POWER
40mGDPR in Practice – What's Hot, What's Not
30mPanel: Do We Need a Global Approach to Data Protection?
40mUnderstanding the GDPR and applying privacy principles in your designs
01h 15mAcademic Session I The GDPR within a continuously reforming digital environment
47mNew Developments in the Field of Data Protection For a More Successful Data Economy
49mPractical privacy: GDPR explained