Full-Body Ownership Illusion Can Change Our Emotion
summary
Two within-subject VR studies (N=28; N=33) use an HMD and Unity first-person mirror with gender-matched avatars to compare synchronous motion vs pre-recorded avatar motion (5 min per condition). Synchronous movement produces stronger body ownership, agency and presence (body-ownership questionnaire), and higher valence on 9-point scales; happy avatar faces amplify the positive shift while angry faces suppress it, but face ownership measures do not show significant effects.
AI-written summary · about
chapters (6)
- 0:00Introduction to embodiment
- 2:38Theoretical background
- 5:44First user study
- 10:38Second user study
- 12:52Conclusion and future work
- 14:24Q&A session
related talks
19mOwnershift: Facilitating Overhead Interaction in Virtual Reality with an Ownership-Preserving ...
11mMove with Style! Enhancing Avatar Embodiment in Virtual Reality through Proprioceptive Motion Fee...
20mMalleable Embodiment: Changing Sense of Embodiment by Spatial-Temporal Deformation of Virtual ...
11mContent-Independent Avatar Ownership Detection for Preventing Sockpuppet-Enabled Violations in th...
08mThe Effects of Hand Representation on Experience and Performance for 3D Interactions in Virtual R...
06mCoolMoves: User Motion Accentuation in Virtual Reality
08mPress A or Wave: User Expectations for NPC Interactions and Nonverbal Behaviour in Virtual Reality
48mTalking VR Turkey