"Violation of my body:" Perceptions of AI-generated non-consensual (intimate) imagery
summary
Survey of 315 U.S. respondents conducted on Prolific (Dec 2023) tests acceptability of AI-generated non-consensual intimate imagery across scenarios that vary creator (friend/partner/stranger), action (sexual vs benign), and intent. Results show strong opposition to creation and especially sharing, but seeking out more acceptable than creation/sharing for many; men rate creation/sharing as more acceptable; higher consent-support scores predict lower acceptability. Analysis uses cumulative linked mixed models plus qualitative coding. Recommendations include deterrence messaging on searches and consent education.
AI-written summary · about
chapters (7)
- 0:00Introduction
- 1:14Research questions
- 2:38Survey design
- 5:05Key findings
- 7:13Implications for responsibility
- 8:59Consent and privacy violations
- 9:41Future directions
related talks
16mFrom Existential to Existing Risks of Generative AI: A Taxonomy of Who Is at Risk,...
46mAI That Reads Emotions: What It Means for Data Privacy, Consent, Your Teams
35mEmpowering Users: A Framework For Informed Consent
15m"There will be less privacy, of course" How and why people in 10 countries expect AI...
07mVision: Human-as-the-Unit Privacy Management with AI Agents
11mHow Does AI Change Privacy? Towards Helping Practitioners Scope, Motivate, and Conduct
15mEnvisioning and Mitigating Privacy Risks for Consumer-Facing AI Product Concepts...
06mFacial Recognition: Understanding Privacy Concerns and Attitudes Across Increasingly