Why Agile transformation fail
summary
Large-scale NatWest agile efforts fail when leadership imposes a big‑bang change that triggers fear, learned helplessness and conflicting coaching; the program runs across 50,000 employees and 400 programs yet used to manage 3,000 projects a year. Concrete fixes that work: start small, scale vertically, create role profiles and communities of practice, use guardrails and a minimum viable framework, and adopt tool choices like Jira/Planview/Mural/Teams. Resulting benefit: some programs start up 5–7 months faster when funding and controls are reworked.
AI-written summary · about
chapters (12)
- 0:00Intro
- 0:45Simple Safe and Smart
- 1:36The Path to Value
- 2:50First Headline Failure
- 4:30Loss Aversion
- 13:59Bigger is not better
- 21:30Diversity is key
- 23:52We are all unique
- 28:50Communities of practice
- 31:46Summary
- 34:07QA Session
- 42:02Conclusion
related talks
44mDragging out and failing Agile Transformation – reasons
50mWhy Agile Doesn't Scale & What You Can Do About It
26mAgile Transformations are not about software
45mWhy You Should not Start an Agile Transformation
33mWhy You Should Not Start an Agile Transformation
48mAgility in Large Transformation Programs – An oxymoron?
36mOne Agile Transformation and two beers please
41mSabotaging an Agile Transformation
