Does Practice Make Perfect? Learning to Deal with Latency in Direct-Touch Interaction
summary
Study trains two groups of 10 participants on an ellipsoidal tracking task for 10 sessions (60 trials each) over two weeks with either 75 ms delay or a ~25 ms baseline. Tracking error gap between groups shrinks by 54% after training, partial compensation transfers to an infinity-shaped task, and performance largely persists after a 7–9 week gap, suggesting multi-day practice reduces but does not fully eliminate touch-latency effects.
AI-written summary · about
chapters (3)
related talks
19mInvestigating Effects of Post-Selection Feedback for Acquiring Ultra-Small Targets on Touchscreen
17mNext-Point Prediction for Direct Touch Using Finite-Time Derivative Estimation
07mSmall Latency Variations do not Affect Player Performance in First-Person Shooters
08mThe Effects of Latency and In-Game Perspective on Player Performance and Game Experience
16mCharacterizing Latency in Touch and Button-Equipped Interactive Systems
19mUsing High Frequency Accelerometer and Mouse to Compensate for End-to-end Latency in Indirect ...
42mBecoming Latency-Native
12mTouchscreens in Motion: Quantifying the Impact of Cognitive Load on Distracted Drivers