What Should Matter to VR Part 2
summary
Argues that VR must prioritize privacy and data justice—citing GDPR, Oculus’s new privacy center and the Cambridge Analytica wake‑up—while resisting headsets that harvest biofeedback (e.g., LukSid Labs). Calls for values‑based business models: pay creators, explore subscriptions and blockchain/open standards (Dcentral, crypto co‑creation) to share value. Demands network‑aware design to prevent social‑VR harassment (surveys show persistent problems) and creation of an ethical public commons and governance for the emerging XR platform.
AI-written summary · about
chapters (11)
- 0:00Start
- 7:04Be vigilant about privacy...
- 8:30but also aware of "data justice"
- 10:36Signal the right things
- 12:49Drive towards values-based models
- 14:14Build toward open standards + user-owned platform
- 15:11Be resolute about Payment
- 16:29Be network aware
- 17:54But be sensitive to network effects
- 18:23Restore the public commons
- 19:14Commit to an ethical framework
related talks
01h 13mFeeling ‘Unsafe’ in Online Spaces Young Peoples' Perspectives on Online Harms and ..
31mXR Around the World Snapshot
30mFireside chat: Breaking the wall of unethical AI
25mThe Next Billion users and the rise of Irrational Design
03mCOMMIT CONF 2018 - Laura Lacarra, Inés Huertas, Beatríz Martín and Victoriano Izquierdo - Interview
35mInclusive Futures:Policy and Software Innovation
26mOpen Data for All: Social Action, Peace Tech & Community Outreach
41mCreating More Inclusive Tech Spaces: Paths Forward
