Why Vlambeer's Rami Ismail is against the current implementation of F2P
summary
A developer argues that the mobile F2P ecosystem is exploitative and often a pay to skip/pay to win design that forces a suboptimal version on players; the alternative is models that let people try before buying or sell a complete experience. Details include a fast top‑down roguelike called Nuclear Throne that is procedurally generated, updated weekly in Early Access on PC/Mac/Linux, and held back from Vita/console until a 1.0 because platform certification prevents rapid updates and beta‑style engagement.
AI-written summary · about
chapters (13)
- 0:00Intro
- 0:20Nuclear Throne on Vita
- 0:58Weekly reviews
- 1:31What is Nuclear Throne
- 2:06What is Nuclear Throne like
- 2:39What is Granby like
- 3:12Arcade inspiration
- 4:09Achievements
- 5:37Business models
- 7:31Console version
- 9:08Vita version
- 10:40Indie
- 11:45Progress
related talks
20mMobile free-to-play fundamentals
45mPublishers in the Age of F2P: Can It Actually Work?
49mFree 2 Play Survival Kit
42mWhy games fail: F2P game design & monetization learnings
49m"Age of Vaporum". What we've learned from the releases of 2 games and pitching process of the third.
46mDesigning the Next Generation of F2P Game Economies
20mGame design for incentivising players
47mRespect the craft: Making premium games in a free to play world