~/talk

Investigating the Effects of Virtual Patients’ Nonsensical Responses on Users’ Facial ...

on YouTube 09m
Talkat VRST 2021 · 2021-12-08..12-10· [webxr, ux-and-product-design]

speakers

name:Alexandre Gomes de Siqueira
links:none on file
name:Heng Yao
links:none on file
name:Anokhi Bafna
links:none on file
name:Sarah Bloch-Elkouby
links:none on file
name:Jenelle Richards
links:none on file
name:Lauren Lloveras
links:none on file
name:Kathleen Feeney
links:none on file
name:Stephanie Morris
links:none on file
name:Erica Musser
links:none on file
name:Benjamin Lok
links:none on file
name:Igor Galynker
links:none on file

resources

video:https://youtu.be/KskkK0Rc9uk
slides:none on file

summary

Clinician participants (ten) interact with two virtual patients, Ernie and Cynthia, while facial expressions are recorded and analyzed with Noldus FaceReader. Researchers extract Negative and Positive facial affective behaviors during three 10-second windows: baseline sensical response, immediately after a nonsensical response, and after the sensical reply that follows. Nonsensical replies raise the percent time showing negative affect; the subsequent sensical reply yields a significant increase in positive affect and a non‑significant trend toward reduced negative affect.

AI-written summary · about

chapters (8)

  1. 0:00Start
  2. 0:15Presenters
  3. 0:34Background
  4. 1:22Motivation
  5. 2:55Virtual Humans
  6. 4:47Participants
  7. 5:31Results
  8. 7:02Discussion and Conclusion

related talks

~/search
type to search 6,249 conferences, 138,987 speakers and 185,172 talks
~/help
cmdctrl k
search every conference, speaker and series
/
focus the filter search
h
home
c
conferences
s
speakers
e
series
t
light / dark — the status bar button does the same
?
this help
esc
close this, then clear every filter — or just the search, while you are typing in it

Ignored while you are typing. Pages without a filter rail have no search to focus.