U-Boot in the Fast Lane: Developing a Safety Test Framework for Automotive Applicati...
summary
U-Boot gains a concrete safety capability: a BIST driver upstreamed that lets SPL on a non‑safe A72 trigger built‑in self tests on R5 safety cores, write results to shared nonvolatile storage, and let MCUs read the verdict before starting — a flow that supports a system‑level CAT 3 certification claim. The talk argues misc/ is not scalable and proposes a Safety Test uclass framework, cites ECC enablement timing as an example gap.
AI-written summary · about
chapters (13)
- 0:00Introduction
- 1:28Customer request origin
- 2:52Linux in automotive safety
- 7:49Open-source bootloaders certification
- 9:12U-Boot advantages and limits
- 13:07Safety certifying U-Boot
- 14:52Mixed criticality systems
- 17:40U-Boot for mixed criticality
- 19:49Built-in self-test in U-Boot
- 21:15Customer BIST use case
- 23:43Future of safety IPs in U-Boot
- 24:48Conclusion and call to action
- 25:31Question and answer session
related talks
36mBuilding a Safe and Open Vehicle Core With Open Source
46mA Maintainable, Scalable, and Verifiable SW Qualification Approach for Automotive in Linux
01h 05mSoftware and Safety
41mTurning the Ignition on Safety: Zephyr RTOS in Automotive Compliance
35mOpen Sesame! Why Functional Safety is the Master Key to Open the Door for Linux into Automotive
35mValidating Freedom From Interference in Automotive Linux
44mThe Road to Safety Certification: How the Xen Project is Making Progress within the Auto Industry
34mDriving Safety Forward: Lessons Learned From Deploying OSS in Real-world Automotive
