Acoustic Sensing and Communication Using Metasurface
summary
System combines a passive 16×16 metasurface with a tiny speaker array and joint optimization of metasurface phase, speaker codebook, and geometry to steer beams without active phased arrays. Prototype is 3D‑printed and passive; experiments show power gains comparable to a 70‑speaker phased array and beamwidth comparable to a 9×16 phased array. Measured improvements include 2.2–2.6× sensing range for distance, 1.9–2.5× for AoA accuracy and about 2.4× communication range increases.
AI-written summary · about
chapters (10)
- 0:00Start
- 1:00Major Challenge
- 1:31Conventional Solution: Receiver side
- 4:05Acoustic Metasurface Pros & Cons
- 6:46System Model
- 10:42Evaluation: SNR Comparison
- 12:50Evaluation: Sensing Performance (Distance Estimation)
- 13:09Evaluation: Sensing Performance (AoA Estimation)
- 13:22Evaluation: Communication Performance (BER)
- 14:01Conclusion
related talks
13mPushing the Physical Limits of IoT Devices with Programmable Metasurfaces
13mMeta-antenna: Mechanically Frequency Reconfigurable Metamaterial Antennas
10mMetaSense: Integrating Sensing Capabilities into Mechanical Metamaterial
05mAcoustic Strength-based Motion Tracking
13mEfficient Wideband Spectrum Sensing Using MEMS Acoustic Resonators
19mRFocus: Beamforming Using Thousands of Passive Antennas
18mWireless Analytics for 3D Printed Objects
16mNR-Surface: NextG-ready µW-reconfigurable mmWave Metasurface
