The application of Networked Music Performance technology
summary
Case study at the University of the Highlands and Islands shows one‑to‑one Networked Music Performance works over domestic gear (laptop webcams, audio interfaces, ordinary broadband) between rural hubs including Shetland, but setup and router/port‑forwarding problems stop many. Musicians tolerate surprisingly large delays by adopting musical leadership or adding controlled delay; steady, pulse‑based repertoire fares best while classical and free rubato suffer. Conclusion: meaningful musical relationships are achievable with typical domestic equipment if a simple, no‑config one‑to‑one system exists.
AI-written summary · about
chapters (8)
- 0:00Introduction to NMP
- 1:27Network music performance basics
- 3:57Latency challenges and solutions
- 6:06Musicians' experience differences
- 9:37Music types and creative risks
- 11:04Highlands and Islands case study
- 13:58Technical barriers and solutions
- 16:46Conclusion and Q&A
related talks
25mLet’s make local and accountable tech!
18mRTC3
47mAt-Home Productions - What’s Next?
20mSharing is Caring: build a peer-to-peer network with WebRTC
25mWhat the Web can Learn from Video Game Networking
42mUsing the Network as a Reliable Platform for Time-Sensitive Systems
12mRemote development, without the networking
46mSelf-Programming Networks: Network Clock Synchronization, Event Playback and Real-time Action