Threat Informed Planning with Macro-level ATT&CK Trending
summary
Research aggregates Mandiant M-Trends, Red Canary, CISA alerts and CTID over 2020–2022 to rank nearly 600 ATT&CK techniques and finds four techniques appear in the top 20 for at least three vendors; M‑Trends provides the most granular sub‑technique frequencies. Command and scripting interpreter frequency jumps (roughly 5% to 31–50% in some reports), and correlation analysis on CISA alerts shows Task Scheduling and Command and Scripting Interpreter act as facilitator hubs with distinct association patterns, suggesting starting detection and hunting on those top four techniques.
AI-written summary · about
chapters (13)
- 0:00Introduction to talk
- 1:06Why focus on threat data
- 3:18ATT&CK framework basics
- 5:06Pyramid of Pain explained
- 6:53Macro-level threat reporting
- 10:04Analyzing top ATT&CK techniques
- 14:46Public vs private sector data
- 16:15Consensus in threat reporting
- 19:58Multiple methods for prioritization
- 20:19Correlation analysis of techniques
- 25:53Other ATT&CK analysis methods
- 28:46Applying findings to defense
- 31:01Summary and Q&A
related talks
38mSightings Ecosystem: A Data-driven Analysis of ATT&CK in the Wild
01h 47mMITRE ATT&CK Fundamentals
35mThese Aren't the Threats You're Looking For: How Our APT Focus Ruins CTI
42mKeynote: The Expanding Universe of Cyber Threats
30mThe SOC Counter ATT&CK
58mMITRE ATT&CK for Developers
40mMITRE ATT&CK® as a Framework for Cloud Threat Investigation
21mUnderstanding the Latest Mitre Att&Ck Evaluation Data
