Roundtable: "The Surveillance State: A Danger, an Opportunity, or a Myth?"
summary
A roundtable debates surveillance states, responding to Jurrien Hamer’s lecture with academics Liesbet van Zoonen and Tomasz Jaskiewicz. The participants discuss whether pervasive surveillance presents a danger, an opportunity, or is a myth, drawing on perspectives from media studies and urban/technology practice.
AI-written summary · about
chapters (10)
- 0:00Discussion introduction
- 3:52Surveillance danger or myth
- 8:05Biometrics biggest concern
- 12:17Government responsibility ethics
- 17:38Responsibility in complex systems
- 23:55Transparency trust in tech
- 27:10Citizen collective responsibility
- 31:24Digital policy professionalization
- 32:06Surveillance remote work education
- 35:39Corona pass innovation
related talks
49mSurveillance capitalism: a new societal condition rising
23mSurveillance Capitalism: Do We Need A New Social Contract
01h 11mSecret windows: Data protection and open data in the smart city environment
53mOur Responsibility to Defeat Mass Surveillance
48mProtection of Private Life — A Challenging Exercise
01h 13mFeeling ‘Unsafe’ in Online Spaces Young Peoples' Perspectives on Online Harms and ..
51mPrivacy, a relic of the past?
01h 03mPanel: The security paradox. Individual privacy vs digital driftnets