Surveillance Capitalism: Do We Need A New Social Contract
summary
Moral Machine research reports 8 million respondents answering roughly 80 million dilemmas, finds broad global agreement plus measurable cultural splits (collectivist vs individualist priorities). Claim: societies must reassign data sovereignty so behavioral data can power public goods (health, transport) while blocking commercial manipulation. Proposals noted: enforcement via GDPR and upcoming EU AI rules, technical audits and access for scientists, and reciprocal oversight—described as two-way surveillance so citizens can monitor governments.
AI-written summary · about
chapters (6)
- 0:00Introduction
- 2:05The natural reaction to surveillance
- 8:18AI regulation
- 11:04New social contracts
- 14:17Can a machine be an actor
- 17:08The Modern Machine
related talks
49mSurveillance capitalism: a new societal condition rising
48mAn Ethical Crisis in Computing?
25mThe Surveillance State: A Danger, an Opportunity, or a Myth?
21mAgainst Solutionism
01h 21mDesigning Collective Technology Governance
31mEthics and Data Science
01h 04mData Hemorrhage, Inequality, and You...
04m"Whether it's moral is a whole other story": Consumer perspectives on privacy