Debate "The force behind decision-making – data, wisdom, and the crowds"
summary
Panel argues that internal prediction markets actually surface tacit employee knowledge by using a double-auction mechanism and competition plus incentives like extra holidays and company-wide rankings. Field experiments run with about 40 participants show only a few active traders but those trades reveal surprising threats that later materialize. Implementations use agent-based traders to restore liquidity, test top-three order transparency to speed learning, and work best in younger firms where processes are not yet rigid.
AI-written summary · about
chapters (8)
- 0:00Introduction to debate
- 1:06Core vs crowd decision-making
- 7:52Motivating employees to contribute
- 18:05SMEs and wisdom of crowds
- 24:21Leadership’s role in crowdsourcing
- 33:31Cooperation vs competition in crowds
- 42:37Policy support for SMEs
- 46:37Closing remarks
related talks
01h 17mLightning Talks
23mBig data and big insights
15mBeyond Efficiency
50mAnalytics – Balancing ‘Advanced’ and ‘Actionable’
56mIntroducing Decision-Making Under Uncertainty to Medical Research:...
44mObviousness Around the Clock
42mPanel Discussion: Improving Industry-Academia Collaboration To Close The Data Science Talent Gap
21mLeveraging Multi-Armed Bandit Algorithms for Dynamic Decision Making
