Navigating the Quantum Era – A Strategic Path to Resilience
summary
Panel contrasts NIST baseline with three national strategies — Collaborative, Sovereign, Capacity-building — and assumes a concrete risk horizon: 2035 RSA break assumption. It cites an EU program running workshops and QERP U courses with Capgemini for asset discovery and migration, a Malaysia sandbox reporting 30 companies, 40 technologies collaborating, and recommends “no‑regret” moves from the PQC migration handbook (asset inventory, vendor roadmaps, hybrid certificates). Operational claim: harvest‑now‑decrypt‑later as immediate risk and crypto agility plus key‑generation control are the practical priorities.
AI-written summary · about
chapters (10)
- 0:00Welcome
- 1:05Panel introduction
- 3:52Global strategy
- 8:28EU migration challenges
- 11:01Cryptographic ownership
- 14:55Quantum threats in finance
- 18:29Asia-Pacific capacity
- 23:52PQC migration benefits
- 26:00Q&A
- 29:40Closing remarks
related talks
33mComparing Strategies for Quantum-Safe Cryptography Adoption in Organizations
39mStrategies for Transitioning to Future-Proof Cryptography
30mNavigating the Quantum Readiness Journey: Hands-on Guidance for Starting Your Migration-
44mQuantum Cyber Risk: How Deep and How Wide?
48mPreparing for Quantum: A Pragmatic Approach towards Readiness
19mAgile is the new black – Why Preparing for Postquantum Crypto also Matters to You!
20mCryptographic Resilience in the Quantum Era
23mAsk the Experts: Global Perspectives on Post Quantum Cryptography Governance